One of the big debates about using the HPV vaccine in men
has had to do with the fact that it's mostly been promoted as an
anti-cancer vaccine. Although HPV related cancers - such as rectal, throat and, penile cancers - do affect men,
they are not generally considered to be as big an issue as cervical
cancer is in women. Furthermore, many of these cancers are more common
in men who have sex with men, a category which many parents - rightly or
wrongly - do not think contains their sons. Thus, the benefits of the
vaccine for young men have largely been seen as indirect - protecting
their partners - even though they should see some direct benefits as
well.
These direct benefits were recently confirmed by the publication of
the results of a large Phase III vaccine trial of Gardasil in 16-26 year
old men. The study, which appeared in the February 3 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, found that Gardasil was quite effective in reducing genital warts
in men who had not been previously exposed to the covered types of HPV.
This adds to the evidence which, only last month, led to the FDA
approval of the vaccine for preventing anal cancer in both men and women.
Right now, universal vaccination of young men is unlikely to be
recommended for a variety of reasons - including the fact that the
vaccine is expensive and vaccination simply may not be a cost effective
solution to HPV related health problems. Still, there is a growing
amount of evidence that HPV vaccination may be, at least, worth talking
about with your teenage sons. If nothing else, doing so may be a good
way to initiate important discussions of safe sex.
No comments:
Post a Comment